What I'm saying is this: it's an unreliable measurement technique unless you have standardized tools and lab equipment. That is, until I let my shoulder relax, the angles changed, and I suddenly realized Angenlina Jolie has many attractive characteristics. Then I cocked my wrist and suddenly wanted. Then I pulled my fingers more tightly together, and I was straight again. I, falling firmly toward the hetero male end of the spectrum, slapped my hand on the counter and was forced to realize that I am gay. But too lazy to research the rebuttal and edit the page.Ģd:4d length sounds like bunk to me, mostly because it is so easy to measure (it can be done by anyone) and so easy to mismeasure. * determine the sex of drawers of Palaeolithic hand stencils found in European and Indonesian cavesĢd:4d effects has also supposedly been demonstrated in gorillas, chimpanzees, mice, rats, and zebra finches. * handedness, autism, other immune diseases * Fraternal birth order effect on digit ratio. * Difference in digit ratio between identical female twins discordant for sexual orientation Some studies correlate male homosexuality and 2D:4D positively, others negatively. * Gay vs straight men, but most studies find no differences in digit ratio between gay and straight men. * Bem sex role score in women erotic role preferences in gay men. * Exam scores: a higher ratio is correlated with higher exam scores among male students
* Perceived 'dominance' and masculinity of man's face * Risk for eating disorders in females and males
A single ratio of finger length, can apparently determine all of the following in humans: * Sperm counts The Wikipedia entry is crazy stupid on this topic. I have to admit this is a new one on me, but it's obvious to me that it's complete BS.
0 kommentar(er)
